Ethical or Unethical Behaviour at Boeing Case Study

Ethical or Unethical Behaviour at Boeing - bailiwick Study ExampleIt has been observed that as a consequence from the cancellation of the order from Pentagon, the familiarity had to bear an particular(a) cost burden of more than $1 billion in its sales. Moreoer, the firm was also banned from statement in the federal contracts for around 20 months which in turn affected its shareholders, employees as well as investors by a large extent. Additionally, the connection was also found to be frequently changing its chief operating officers in quick succession which created confusions and cost burden as well as early(a) lead hazards within the internal business environment of the organisation. For instance, in 2002 the company was conduct by Philip Condit. by and by few years Condit was replaced by Harry Stonecipher, but he was also soon taken over by McNerny. Such frequent changes in the CEOs of the company eventually affected its monetary performances by a large extent. From the overall compend, it could be concluded that the ethical or unethical practices of the company in the presence ultimately affected the stakeholders of Boeing including the investors, the employees and the shareholders among others (Griffin 111-112). Q.2. Which Organizational Approach To Social Responsibility Did Boeing Appear To intent Under The Leadership Of Condit And Stonecipher? How Do You Think the Approach Changed Under McNerneys Leadership? Under the leadership of Philip Condit, Boeing was observed to be highly inclined towards mergers, both in the horizontal and vertical directions within the airlines patience as a strategy to obtain competitive advantages. It has been observed in this regard that the merger led by Philip Condit was not successful which rather gave rise... Apart from that in another issue of stolen documents from the rival company and thus practicing unethical competition, Boeing had to face cancellation of the already placed order form Pentagon and a ban of 20 months from bidding in federal contracts (Griffin 111-112). Therefore, it can be observed that Boeing, under the leadership of Condit was mostly focus on competitive positioning of the company owing to which it can be stated that the company followed a compliance-based approach towards its CSR initiatives, which however, resulted in a failure.After the leadership of Philip Condit was replaced by Harry Stonecipher, the company also had to deal with legion(predicate) such issues. In the year 2005, Pentagon further cancelled some of its deals with the company because of ethical issues that depicted difference against womanly workers with Boeing. The female workers also claimed that they were underpaid and filed a suit against the company. The company suffered a loss of billions of dollars from the cancellation of the Pentagon deal obscure from spending almost $73 million in order to settle the suit filed by its female workers. Furthermore, Stonecipher was also under the scan ner for his affair with one of the female subordinates of the company which fuelled the allegation of sexual anguish against him. As a result of such issues, Stonecipher was forced to resign from his position as the CEO of Boeing. From the analysis of both the leadership styles of the CEOs in Boeing, it can be affirmed that the organisational approach.