Transport planning policy article critique Essay

Transport plan policy article critique - Essay representativePeak anything is a phrase that Heinberg and other ecological advocates use to indicate that most finite resources ar reaching or will reach exploitation limits and will thitherafter only give little and less of the resource at higher and higher cost, but peak oil has achieved special attention. Since every piece of the economy needs petrochemicals in production (and not just in factories but alike in high-intensity Green Revolution agriculture), consumption, transportation and distribution, peak oil means the end of growth, since every element of the society becomes perpetually more expensive. The connection with transportation is obvious Transportation must be sustainable if it is to be relevant. Hank Dittmars Transport and Neighbourhoods (2008), and his earlier collaboration with Ditland (2004), emphasizes sustainability in its approach. Dittmar argues that sustainability will have to be part of a ground-up approach to creation. Its meaningless, for example, to make it easier to navigate an inner city without a car if the people who work at the inner city commute from a suburb that is designed for urban sprawl. Dittmar argues for sustainable cities. These cities are characterized by a number of factors 1. Sustainable transportation and sustainable city design being interlinked 2. ... calls the five fine pint, or the five minute trip to a local pub this means that its not just walkability for access to essential institutions like groceries and schools, but in addition walkability to reasonable centers of entertainment and social interaction 5. Accessible public transportation A subway is meaningless if it takes a car to get there 6. Market-based strategies 7. Scale of problem demands immediate and technological solutions Dittmars position as a Prince Foundation urban design analyst does provide his claims with authority and plausibility, but I fear as I look at his analysis that perhaps the re is the classic problem of an expert analyzing his own issue. First Experts tend to flash back everything to their core issue. Second Experts often can only see things within the theoretical blinders of their own profession. urban planning and transportation are obviously connected, but it seems naive to think that its just urban planning and its inaccessibility to non-commuting approaches causes driving issues. There are obviously numerous other factors. Gas and oil subsidies in the West, particularly in America, make it artificially easy to drive cars (Geiger and Hamburger, 2010). In general, public investment into look provides corporations with the means to produce antisocial institutions Research in general should focus on other factors. Theres also a culture of car ownership. Cars are signs of independence, prosperity and masculinity The purr of a Lamborghini still has corking pull even in this increasingly green age. Its possible to design a city where no one needs to dr ive a car, and people will still prefer to. And the problem is that jackpot transportation not being sexy means that less people ride, which reduces the number of stops the dodging